Collie v. Barron et al
| David B Collie |
| Hugo Barron, Venessa Flores, L Harrington, D G Rohloff, Joel Fitzgerald, City of Fort Worth, Doe Defendants 1-11 and Tarrant County |
| 4:2017cv00211 |
| March 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Fort Worth Office |
| Tarrant |
| John McBryde |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
Memorandum Opinion and Order...Barron's motion for summary judgment is granted, plaintiff take nothing on his claim for excessive force against Barron; and that such claim is dismissed. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 7/21/2017) (wrb)
|
|
Filing
46
Memorandum Opinion and Order...the motion of Barron is granted in part and plaintiff's claims against Barron for racketeering activity, malicious prosecution, and false imprisonment are dismissed. Further ordered that if Barron intends to purs ue a motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, he file such motion by 4pm on Jun 16 2017. Further ordered that the motions of Harrington, Rohloff and Tarrant County to dismiss are granted, and that plaintiff's claims against said defendants are dismissed. The court determines that there is no just reason for delay and directs entry of final judgment as to the dismissal of the claims against defendants Harrington, Rohloff, and Tarrant County. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 6/1/2017) (wrb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
