Ancelmo v. USA
Petitioner: Francisco Maldanado Ancelmo
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 4:2018cv00827
Filed: October 9, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 FINAL JUDGMENT... Consistent with the court's memorandum opinion and order signed this date, The court ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES that the motion of movant, Francisco Maldanado Ancelmo under 28 U.S.C. 2255 be, and is hereby, dismissed as untimely. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/27/2018) (wxc)
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER... The court ORDERS that movant's motion be, and is hereby, dismissed as untimely. Pursuant to Rule 22(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule ll(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts, and 28 U.S.C. 2253(c) (2), for the reasons discussed herein, the court further ORDERS that a certificate of appealability be, and is hereby, denied, as movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/27/2018) (wxc)
November 27, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11,12. Tue Nov 27 10:33:42 CST 2018 (crt)
November 26, 2018 Filing 10 RESPONSE/Objection filed by Francisco Maldanado Ancelmo re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss. (bdb)
November 8, 2018 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss as Untimely Filed. filed by USA (bcr)
November 8, 2018 Filing 8 Notice of Substitution of Counsel by AUSA. Amy J Mitchell-DOJ for USA added, Wes Hendrix-DOJ terminated. (bcr)
October 25, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION to Deny All Consent to Magistrate Judge in This Proceeding, and Request for District Court Judge to Adjudicate this Proceeding, filed by Francisco Maldanado Ancelmo (bcr) Terminated Per Chambers; 2255 Not Subject For Consent. Modified on 10/25/2018 (bcr). Modified on 10/26/2018 (bcr).
October 25, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Pleadings filed by Francisco Maldanado Ancelmo (bcr)
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 The court ORDERS that: (1) The Clerk shall provide a true and correct copy ofthis order to movant; (2) The Clerk shall provide a true and correct copy ofmovant's motion and of this order to respondent, directed to the attention of the Criminal Section Habeas Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Fort Worth Division; (3) By November 8, 2018, the United States Attorney shall file and serve an answer complying with the provisions of Rule 5(b) of the Rules Governing 2255 Cases; and (4) By November 20, 2018, movant shall file and serve any reply he wishes to make to such answer. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/9/2018) (bcr)
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/9/2018) (tln)
October 9, 2018 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (tln)
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER (Originally docketed in Criminal Case Number 4:15-cr-129-A (14) as entry #543): On September 24, 2018, Maldanado filed a response to the court's September 13 order in which he requested an extension of time of 270-365 days in which to amend his motion. He did not seek to withdraw the motion. Accordingly, the court is recharacterizing the motion Maldanado filed December 29, 2017, docketed as item 516 in this case, as one under 28 U.S.C. 2255 and directing the clerk to so file it. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/9/2018) (tln)
October 9, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Oct 9 15:46:18 CDT 2018 (crt)
October 9, 2018 New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to Judge McBryde. (tln)
October 9, 2018 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3,4. Tue Oct 9 11:26:01 CDT 2018 (crt)
December 29, 2017 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Originally docketed in Criminal Case Number 4:15-cr-129-A (14) as entry #516). Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (tln)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ancelmo v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Francisco Maldanado Ancelmo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Wes Hendrix-DOJ
Represented By: Amy J Mitchell-DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?