Smith v. Pallida, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Andrea D Smith
Defendant: Mark W Stout and Pallida, LLC
Case Number: 4:2018cv00870
Filed: October 23, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: John McBryde
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2018 Filing 22 Appendix in Support filed by Mark W Stout re #14 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s), #2 Additional Page(s), #3 Additional Page(s), #4 Additional Page(s)) (bdb)
December 14, 2018 Filing 21 Appendix in Support filed by Pallida, LLC re #17 MOTION to Dismiss. (Attachments: #1 appx pt 2 pgs 42-83, #2 appx pt 3 pgs 84-131, #3 appx pt 4 pgs 132-181, #4 appx pt 5 pgs 182-226) (tln)
December 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Order Unfiling #18 Appendix in Support filed by Pallida, LLC due to the following deficiency: Did not provide a copy that was spiral-bound on the side and that was broken into volumes not containing so many pages as to make them unwieldy, and did not have any highlighting to indicate the portions of any of the items that are of particular pertinence. If Pallida wishes to retrieve the item from the clerk's office, it must do so by 2:00 p.m. on December 17, 2018. (see order) (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/13/2018) (tln)
December 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Order Unfiling #15 Appendix in Support, filed by Mark W Stout due to the following deficiency: Did not provide a copy that was spiral-bound on the side and that was broken into volumes not containing so many pages as to make them unwieldy, and did not have any highlighting to indicate the portions of any of the items that are of particular pertinence. If Stout wishes to retrieve the item from the clerk's office, he must do so by 2:00 p.m. on December 17, 2018. (see order) (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/13/2018) (tln)
December 12, 2018 Filing 18 ***UNFILED PER #20 ORDER***Appendix in Support filed by Pallida, LLC re #17 MOTION TO DISMISS. (Attachments: #1 appx pt 2 pgs 42-83, #2 appx pt 3 pgs 84-131, #3 appx pt 4 pgs 132-181, #4 appx pt 5 pgs 182-226) (tln) Modified text on 12/13/2018 (tln).
December 12, 2018 Filing 17 MOTION TO DISMISS AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT THEREOF filed by Pallida, LLC. (tln)
December 12, 2018 Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Pallida, LLC. (tln)
December 12, 2018 Filing 15 ***UNFILED PER #19 ORDER***Appendix in Support filed by Mark W Stout re #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6). (Attachments: #1 appx pt 2 pgs 46-90, #2 appx pt 3 pgs 91-140, #3 appx pt 4 pgs 141-190, #4 appx pt 5 pgs 191-228) (tln) Modified text on 12/13/2018 (tln).
December 12, 2018 Filing 14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6) AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT THEREOF filed by Mark W Stout. (tln)
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Came on for consideration the #12 motion of defendant Mark W. Stout ("Stout") to extend Stout's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff has not opposed or otherwise responded to Stout's motion. The court finds that the motion should be granted. The court ORDERS that Stout's motion be, and is hereby, granted, and Stout be, and is hereby, granted an extension of time until December 13, 2018, in which to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 12/6/2018) (tln)
December 6, 2018 Filing 12 MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT filed by Mark W Stout. (tln)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Pallida, LLC answer due 12/12/2018. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 11/28/2018) (tln)
November 27, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT filed by Pallida, LLC. (tln)
November 1, 2018 Filing 9 Supplemental Document (Civil Cover Sheet) by Andrea D Smith as to #1 Complaint. (tln)
November 1, 2018 Filing 8 Judge McBryde's paper original and copies pursuant to the standing order of re: #1 Complaint, #2 Cert. Of Interested Persons/Disclosure Statement, #3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons, #4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons filed by Andrea D Smith. (tln)
October 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 10/24/2018) (tln)
October 24, 2018 Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to Judge McBryde. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (tln)
October 24, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Pallida, LLC, Mark W Stout. (tln)
October 23, 2018 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Andrea D Smith. (Jarzombek, Jerry)
October 23, 2018 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Andrea D Smith. (Jarzombek, Jerry)
October 23, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Andrea D Smith. (Jarzombek, Jerry)
October 23, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Andrea D Smith. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-9537312) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Jarzombek, Jerry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Pallida, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea D Smith
Represented By: Jerry J Jarzombek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark W Stout
Represented By: Robert A Ewert
Represented By: Christopher C White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pallida, LLC
Represented By: Jennifer Holland Litke
Represented By: Grant D Blaies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?