Stecz-Hunter v. United States Department of Education et al
Phyllis Darlene Stecz-Hunter |
Allied Interstate LLC and United States Department of Education |
4:2019cv00142 |
February 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Hal R Ray |
Other Statutes: Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew O'Hair Stromquist on behalf of Allied Interstate LLC. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Stromquist, Matthew) |
Filing 12 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by United States Department of Education. (Civins-DOJ, Braden) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Stay of Administrative Wage Garnishment filed by Phyllis Darlene Stecz-Hunter. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (bdb) |
Filing 10 ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: The Joint Report shall be filed on or before April 12, 2019. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 3/15/2019) (skg) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Defendant Allied Interstate LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead and #8 Defendant United States Department of Education's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. Accordingly, Defendants are therefore ORDERED to file an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before April 22, 2019. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 3/15/2019) (skg) |
Filing 8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by United States Department of Education (Civins-DOJ, Braden) |
Filing 7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Allied Interstate LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Christakis, Anna-Katrina) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Anna-Katrina S Christakis on behalf of Allied Interstate LLC. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Christakis, Anna-Katrina) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted as to All Defendants as to All Defendants. (Stecz-Hunter, Phyllis) |
Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wrb) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Ray preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (wrb) |
Filing 2 Summons issued as to Allied Interstate LLC, United States Department of Education, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (wrb) |
Filing 1 Plaintiff's Original COMPLAINT against Allied Interstate LLC, United States Department of Education filed by Phyllis Darlene Stecz-Hunter. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number FW032185) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wrb) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. cy to Stecz-Hunter Fri Feb 15 12:02:46 CST 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.