Burch v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
| William Paul Burch |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| 4:2019cv00424 |
| May 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| John McBryde |
| Real Property: All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ORIGINAL QUIET TITLE PETITION WITH JURY DEMAND against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. filed by William Paul Burch. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (edm) |
| Filing 16 Motion to Remand filed by William Paul Burch (wxc) |
Filing 15
ORDER Unfiling #11 MOTION to Remand filed by William Paul Burch due to the following deficiency: This case is not designated for electronic filing. All documents should be filed in traditional paper form, bearing the original signature of the filer. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 7/1/2019) (bdb)
|
| Filing 14 Appendix in Support filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. re #12 MOTION to Consolidate (Attachments: #1 pgs 51-101, #2 pgs 102-139) (edm) |
| Filing 13 Brief in Support filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. re #12 MOTION to Consolidate (edm) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Consolidate filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (edm) |
| Filing 11 ***UNFILED AND STRICKEN PER 15 ORDER*** MOTION to Remand filed by William Paul Burch (Burch, William) Modified on 7/1/2019 (bdb). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FOR REPLEADING: The court ORDERS that by July 10, 2019, plaintiff file anamended pleading, and that by July 24, 2019, defendant file an answer or other response to such amended complaint. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 6/27/2019) (edm)
|
| Filing 9 Appendix to Brief in Support of Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. re #7 MOTION to Dismiss (wxc) |
| Filing 8 Brief in Support of Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. re #7 MOTION to Dismiss (wxc) |
| Filing 7 Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (wxc) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (edm) |
| Filing 5 Judge McBryde's paper original and copies pursuant to the standing order of document #1 filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (edm) |
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (tln) |
|
Filing 3
Standing ORDER Concerning Paper Filing in Cases Assigned to District Judge John McBryde...see order for specifics. (Ordered by Senior Judge John McBryde on 5/24/2019) (tln)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to Judge McBryde. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (tln) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 17th Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, case number 017-307635-19 filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10008374) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C, #4 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Cover Sheet Supplement Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet) (Lewis, Wm) |
| NOTICE of Related Case filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (see dod. #1 for image) (tln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Burch v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | R Kendall Yow |
| Represented By: | Wm Lance Lewis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Paul Burch | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
