Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company v. Deere & Company
| Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company |
| Deere & Company |
| 4:2019cv00425 |
| May 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Contract: Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss (Taylor, David) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendant's deadline to answer the allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint is extended until fourteen (14) days after the Court rules on the pending Motion to Dismiss. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 6/21/2019) (skg)
|
|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #8 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Michelle D. Hurley. If not already done, Applicant must register as an ECF User within 14 days (LR 5.1(f)). (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 6/21/2019) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #7 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of David J. Taylor. If not already done, Applicant must register as an ECF User within 14 days (LR 5.1(f)). (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 6/21/2019) (chmb)
|
| Filing 8 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney Michelle D. Hurley (Filing fee $25; Receipt number 0539-10065403) filed by Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sebesta, William) |
| Filing 7 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing for Attorney David J. Taylor (Filing fee $25; Receipt number 0539-10065318) filed by Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sebesta, William) |
| Filing 6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Deere & Company (Zinnecker, Ben) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Deere & Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A)Attorney Ben T Zinnecker added to party Deere & Company(pty:dft) (Zinnecker, Ben) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Deere & Company ; served on 5/29/2019. (Sebesta, William) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Deere & Company. (edm) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (edm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Deere & Company filed by Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company as subrogee of CWH Farms. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10008814) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Sebesta, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
