Jones v. JPS et al
Antwone Jones |
Tarrant County Jail and JPS |
4:2019cv00608 |
August 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4,5. Tue Aug 6 11:16:31 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (wxc) |
Filing 3 Motion for the Appointment of Counsel filed by Antwone Jones (wxc) |
Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Antwone Jones (wxc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (1983) against All Defendants filed by Antwone Jones. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.