D'Avignon et al v American Airlines Inc et al
Robert D'Avignon and Esther Chavez |
American Airlines Inc and Romack Staffing International, Ltd. |
4:2020cv00925 |
August 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Labor: Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,,,, filed by Romack Staffing International, Ltd.. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice.Attorney Laura Alaniz added to party Romack Staffing International, Ltd.(pty:dft) (Alaniz, Laura) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by American Airlines, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate American Airlines Group Inc for American Airlines, Inc.. (Cawyer, Russell) |
Filing 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by American Airlines, Inc. with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Russell D Cawyer added to party American Airlines, Inc.(pty:dft) (Cawyer, Russell) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Romack Staffing International, Ltd. ; served on 9/14/2020. (Ghio, R) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to American Airlines, Inc. ; served on 9/11/2020. (Ghio, R) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to American Airlines, Inc., Romack Staffing International, Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Summons) (bdb) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (bdb) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Esther Chavez, Robert D'Avignon. (Ghio, R) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against American Airlines, Inc., Romack Staffing International, Ltd. filed by Robert D'Avignon, Esther Chavez. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-11083948) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Ghio, R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.