Perez v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
| Jenny Ayala Perez |
| Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
| Social Security Administration - Interested Party |
| 4:2021cv00594 |
| April 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey L Cureton |
| Mark Pittman |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER PERMITTING FILING IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND ORDER REGARDING COMPLETION OF SUMMONS AND ISSUANCE OF PROCESS #2 ...The above named Plaintiff is authorized to proceed with the commencement of this civil uit without prepayment of fees or the necessity of giving security therefor, such that the motion/application to proceed in forma pauperis [doc. 2] be, and is hereby, GRANTED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 4/28/2021) (wxc)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #4 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Designation of Local Counsel. In the motion, Plaintiff requests, pursuant to Local Rule 83.10, leave to proceed without local counsel. Having carefully considered the motion, the Court concludes that it should be GRANTED unless further ordered by the Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 4/28/2021) (chmb)
|
| Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (pef) |
| Filing 5 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Jenny Ayala Perez re #4 MOTION Waive Local Counsel (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 4 MOTION Waive Local Counsel filed by Jenny Ayala Perez (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Jenny Ayala Perez. (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jenny Ayala Perez (Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner, Social Security Administration filed by Jenny Ayala Perez. (Filer fee note- IFP motion in complaint or to be filed) Clerk to issue summons(es) if the motion to proceed IFP is granted. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Letter to Clerk) (Olinsky, Howard) Modified docket text on 4/26/2021 (pef). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
