Carter v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
| Denise Carter |
| Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company |
| ADR Provider |
| 4:2021cv00695 |
| May 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Mathisen, Eric) |
Filing 27
FINAL JUDGMENT: This Final Judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. In accordance with the Order dismissing this case #26 : It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this civil action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk shall transmit a true copy of this Final Judgment to the parties. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 7/29/2021) (sre)
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER: On July 28, 2021, Defendant filed a Notice of Settlement which stated that Parties reached a settlement of this matter #25 . Therefore, the Court ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 7/29/2021) (sre)
|
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (Ng, Stephanie) |
|
Filing 24
SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial on this Court's four-week docket beginning August 15, 2022 in US Courthouse, Courtroom 4th Floor, 501 W. 10th St. Fort Worth, TX 76102-3673 before Judge Mark Pittman. Counsel and the parties shall be ready for trial on two days' notice at any time during this four-week period. Joinder of Parties due by 9/17/2021. Amended Pleadings due by 9/17/2021. Deadline for mediation is on or before 2/16/2022. Discovery due by 3/18/2022. Motions due by 4/18/2022. Pretrial Order due by 7/21/2022. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 7/20/2021) (sre) Modified on 7/22/2021 (sre).
|
| Filing 23 ANSWER to #21 Amended Complaint filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (Mathisen, Eric) |
| Filing 22 Joint STATUS REPORT Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Ng, Stephanie) |
| Filing 21 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Denise Carter filed by Denise Carter. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s)) (Donaldson, Madison) |
| Filing 20 AFFIDAVIT re #12 Order on Motion to Set Aside,,,, by Denise Carter. (Vessel, John) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stephanie C. Ng on behalf of Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Ng, Stephanie) |
| Filing 18 AFFIDAVIT re #12 Order on Motion to Set Aside,,,, by Denise Carter. (McDonald, Britney) |
| Filing 17 AFFIDAVIT re #12 Order on Motion to Set Aside,,,, by Denise Carter. (Donaldson, Madison) |
| Filing 16 AFFIDAVIT re #12 Order on Motion to Set Aside,,,, by Denise Carter. (Whitehead, Marc) |
| Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT re #12 Order on Motion to Set Aside,,,, by Denise Carter. (Donaldson, Madison) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Madison Tate Donaldson for Luke Radney on behalf of Denise Carter. (Donaldson, Madison) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: Lead counsel for each party (or designee attorney with appropriate authority) and any unrepresented party (except for a prisoner litigant proceeding pro se) shall confer (the "Scheduling Conference") in a face-to-face conference as soon as practicable. The Joint Report shall be filed on or before July 12, 2021. When submitting proposed dates to the Court, the parties should assume that the Scheduling Order will be entered by the Court within approximately one month from the date of the parties' Joint Report. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 6/21/2021) (sre)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER: Having considered the Motion #11 , docket entries, and applicable law, the Court finds that the Motion should be and is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court INSTRUCTS the Clerk of this Court to REINSTATE this case on the Court's active docket. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before 12:00 p.m. on Friday, June 25, 2021, all Plaintiffs counsel located in Houston, Texas, shall each read: (1) Dondi Properties Corp. v. Commerce Savings & Loan Assoc., 121 F.R.D. 284 (N.D. Tex. 1988); (2) Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; (3) the Texas Lawyers Creed; (4) the Texas Rules of Professional Conduct; and (5) this Courts Judge Specific Requirements. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all Plaintiff's counsel located in Houston, Texas, shall individually certify to the Court via a filed and sworn affidavit on or before 12:00 p.m. on Friday, June 25, 2021, that they have read, understand, and will comply with these five documents throughout the remainder of this litigation. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 6/18/2021) (sre)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION to Set Aside #10 Judgment, #9 Order of Dismissal or Administrative Closure, and Reinstate Case on Docket filed by Denise Carter (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Donaldson, Madison) |
|
Filing 10
FINAL JUDGMENT: This Final Judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. In accordance with the Order dismissing this case #9 . It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 6/15/2021) (sre)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: A review of the record reveals that as of the date of this order, Plaintiff is still not in compliance with Local Rule 83.10(a). Because Plaintiff has failed to follow the Local Rules of the Northern District, the Court ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 6/15/2021) (sre)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeremy William Hays on behalf of Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Hays, Jeremy) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: (1) on or before June 25, 2021, Plaintiff file an amended complaint; and, (2) on or before July 16, 2021, Defendant file an answer or other response to the amended complaint. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer is hereby DENIED as moot. ECF No. #6 . (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 6/4/2021) (mmw)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Mathisen, Eric) |
| Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Hartford Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate Hartford Life, Inc., Corporate Parent/Other Affiliate The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., for Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Mathisen, Eric) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric P Mathisen on behalf of Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Mathisen, Eric) |
| Filing 2 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Notice of Removal,,,,, by Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Mathisen, Eric) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0539-11933794) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, Index of State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit(s) 1, State Court Docket, #3 Exhibit(s) 2, Original Petition, #4 Exhibit(s) 3, Citation, #5 Exhibit(s) 4, Plaintiff's counsel's letter to court dated 4-13-2021, #6 Cover Sheet, #7 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Mathisen, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
