Aspiration Innovation, Inc. v. Subaru Corporation et al
| Aspiration Innovation, Inc. |
| Subaru Corporation and Subaru of America, Inc. |
| 4:2022cv00095 |
| February 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Terry R Means |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Property Rights: Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Final Order. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (bdb) |
| Civil Case Terminated. The clerk will prepare the final Report to the Patent/Trademark or Copyright Office. (bdb) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Dismissal without Prejudice filed by Aspiration Innovation, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 8 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (npk) |
Filing 7
ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT. The undersigned judge, having taken senior status, desires to have this case re-assigned to an active-status judge. Case reassigned to Judge Reed C. O'Connor for all further proceedings. Senior Judge Terry R Means no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 2/11/2022) (npk)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Subaru Corporation, Subaru of America, Inc. (sre) |
| Filing 5 Report to Patent/Trademark Office of Initiating Document. Form AO 120 e-mailed to notice_of_suit@uspto.gov. (sre) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Means. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (sre) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Aspiration Innovation, Inc.. (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 2 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS to #1 Complaint,,,,, by Plaintiff Aspiration Innovation, Inc.. (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Aspiration Innovation, Inc.. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-12577943) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 Exhibit(s), #5 Exhibit(s), #6 Exhibit(s)) (Anderson, Kirk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
