Ruiz v. Bhambra et al
| Sandro Ruiz |
| Gurpreet Bhambra and Simrut Trucking Inc. |
| 4:2022cv00793 |
| September 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER Before the Court is Defendants second Unopposed Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel #13 . Counsel for Defendants Gurpreet Bhambra and Simrut Trucking Inc. is admitted to the Northern District of Texas but is located in Houston, Texas. Defendants ask for leave under Local Rule 83.10 to proceed without local counsel. The Court GRANTS the motion to proceed without local counsel and ORDERS that Defendants counsel abide by all local rules of this Court, including the standards of litigation conduct set forth in Dondi Properties Corporation v. Commerce Savings & Loan Association, 121 F.R.D. 284 (N.D. Tex. 1988) (per curiam). It is further ORDERED that if proceeding without local counsel disrupts this litigation or otherwise results in a failure to comply with the rules of this Court, Defendants will be required to obtain local counsel immediately. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 10/17/2022) (jgg)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to File Proceed without local counsel filed by Gurpreet Bhambra, Simrut Trucking Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Best, Brandon) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER Before the Court is Defendants unopposed Motion to Substitute Counsel #11 . Having reviewed the motion, the Court finds that it should be and is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants motion to substitute Mr.Ramirez with Mr.Best as Defendants counsel of record. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 10/13/2022) (jgg)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Substitute Attorney, added attorney John A Ramirez,Brandon K. Best for Gurpreet Bhambra,Brandon K. Best for Simrut Trucking Inc.. Motion filed by Gurpreet Bhambra, Simrut Trucking Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion to Substitute Counsel) (Ramirez, John) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sandro Ruiz. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (McAlpine, Kiernan) |
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 12/5/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 12/5/2022. Motions due by 4/10/2023. Deadline for mediation is on or before 2/8/2023. Discovery due by 3/10/2023. Pretrial Order due by 7/13/2023. Jury Trial set for 8/7/2023. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 10/6/2022) (jgg)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Initial Disclosures filed by Gurpreet Bhambra, Simrut Trucking Inc. (Ramirez, John) |
| Filing 7 Joint STATUS REPORT Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order filed by Gurpreet Bhambra, Simrut Trucking Inc.. (Ramirez, John) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Sep 27 15:15:54 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to proceed without local counsel (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/26/2022) (jgg)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel filed by Gurpreet Bhambra, Simrut Trucking Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ramirez, John) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: Lead counsel for each party and any unrepresented party shall confer as soon as practicable. The Joint Report shall be filed on or before October 6, 2022 (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/8/2022) (jgg)
|
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (jgg) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Gurpreet Bhambra, Simrut Trucking Inc.. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Ramirez, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Gurpreet Bhambra, Simrut Trucking Inc.. (Filing fee $402; receipt number ATXNDC-13117658) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Index, #2 Exhibit(s) B - Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit(s) C - Original Petition, #4 Exhibit(s) D - Proof of Service, #5 Exhibit(s) E - Defendants' Original Answer, #6 Exhibit(s) F - Defendants' Jury Demand, #7 Exhibit(s) G - Notice of Removal - State, #8 Exhibit(s) H - Certificate of Interested Parties) (Ramirez, John) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Wed Sep 7 16:32:12 CDT 2022 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
