Keeton v. Ramirez et al
| Brackster Emory Keeton |
| Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID |
| Laura Haney |
| 4:2022cv00844 |
| September 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Terry R Means |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO PAY FILING FEE Petitioner filed a letter, which the Court construes as a motion for an extension of time to pay the filing fee. #7 After review, the Court GRANTS the motion. Petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing fee within thirty days of this order. If Petitioner fails to do so, the Court will dismiss this habeas action for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 11/8/2022) (jgg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Tue Nov 8 14:31:49 CST 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Letter Head filed by Brackster Emory Keeton (jgg) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon Sep 26 09:31:38 CDT 2022 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Petitioner has not paid the $5.00 filing fee or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperi. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 9/23/2022) (tjc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Thu Sep 22 14:47:33 CDT 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (jgg) |
| Filing 4 Case electronically transferred in from District of Texas Western; Case Number 5:22-cv-01004. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF TRANSFER - ORDERED that the above-referenced case is TRANSFERRED to the Fort Worth Division of the Northern District of Texas. Signed by Judge Fred Biery. (rg) [Transferred from Texas Western on 9/22/2022.]
|
| Filing 2 Case Opening Letter to Brackster Emory Keeton. (dtg) [Transferred from Texas Western on 9/22/2022.] |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Brackster Emory Keeton. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Copy of Cover Letter, #4 Copy of Envelope)(dtg) [Transferred from Texas Western on 9/22/2022.] |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Bemporad. (dtg) [Transferred from Texas Western on 9/22/2022.] |
| THIS CASE HAS BEEN RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO JUDGE FRED BIERY. (dtg) [Transferred from Texas Western on 9/22/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
