Lombard v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Wilton I. Von Lombard and Wilton Irvon Lombard, Jr
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Case Number: 4:2022cv01058
Filed: November 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey L Cureton
Referring Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: HIA (1395ff)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2023 Filing 9 USM-285 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Attorney General ; served on 12/30/2022. (wxc)
January 9, 2023 Filing 8 USM-285 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration ; served on 12/27/2022. (wxc)
January 9, 2023 Filing 7 USM-285 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration ; served on 1/3/2023. (wxc)
December 1, 2022 Filing 6 Summons issued as to Commissioner, Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (Summons and USM 285 and complaint #1 and order #5 hand-delivered to USMS). (sre)
December 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER PERMITTING FILING IN FORMA PAUPERIS #2 and, ORDER REGARDING COMPLETION OF FORMS and ISSUANCE OF PROCESS : It is therefore ORDERED that the motion/application to proceed in forma pauperis [ docket no, 2] be, and is hereby, GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the clerk complete appropriate and sufficient summons forms to facilitate service of the summons and complaint on defendants. Upon completion of the forms, the clerk is ORDERED to issue summonses, with copy of the complaint attached to each, for service on defendants, and deliver them to the United States Marshal for the Northern District of Texas for service on defendants in the manner contemplated by the rule set forth above. It is further ORDERED that, upon receipt of such papers from the clerk, the United States Marshal for the Northern District of Texas cause service of summonses to be made in the manner contemplated by the rule set forth above. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 12/1/2022) (sre)
December 1, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Thu Dec 1 15:55:03 CST 2022 (crt)
November 30, 2022 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Wed Nov 30 16:30:32 CST 2022 (crt)
November 29, 2022 Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sre)
November 29, 2022 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (sre)
November 29, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Wilton I. Von Lombard. (sre)
November 29, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Social Security Administration - Interested Party filed by Wilton I. Von Lombard. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Complaint NEF sent to SSA OGC and to TXND USAO.) (sre)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lombard v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wilton I. Von Lombard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wilton Irvon Lombard, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?