Mathis v. Experian Information Solutions
| Kevin Mathis |
| Experian Information Solutions |
| 5:2020cv00274 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| D Gordon Bryant |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Tue Jan 5 10:00:37 CST 2021 (crt) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr on 12/4/2020) (bdg)
|
| Filing 6 (Document Restricted) STATEMENT OF INCOME filed by Kevin Mathis. (zzm) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff file a statement clarifying his total monthly income. Due to the significant disparity between the two figures, the Court directs Plaintiff to file a statement that ( 1) explains the discrepancy and (2) accurately reports his total average monthly income in past twelve months, as well as his expected total income next month. This statement shall be filed with the Clerk of Court within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr on 11/25/2020) (bmh)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed Nov 25 11:46:34 CST 2020 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (bmh) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Bryant (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr. (bmh) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kevin Mathis. (bmh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Experian Information Solutions filed by Kevin Mathis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bmh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/17/2020: #1 Cover Sheet) (bmh). |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3,4. Tue Nov 17 15:18:40 CST 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mathis v. Experian Information Solutions | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kevin Mathis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
