Chappell v. Tom Green County Detention Center et al
Thomas D Chappell |
Tom Green County Detention Center and FNU Ramirez |
6:2020cv00092 |
September 4, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
James Wesley Hendrix |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 4. mailed to Plaintiff along with the Application for IFP as set out in the order. Tue Sep 15 10:49:14 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (dsr) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (dsr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FNU Ramirez, Tom Green County Detention Center filed by Thomas D Chappell. (Filing fee $No fee received.) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 envelope) (dsr) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No: 3. mailed to Plaintiff. Fri Sep 4 16:24:00 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.