Hill v. North Texas State Hospital et al
Dwight Ray Hill |
North Texas State Hospital, James E Smith, John Emory Sobiesk and Teresa Catlin Tempelmeyer |
7:2009cv00158 |
September 29, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Wichita Falls Office |
Wichita |
Reed C O'Connor |
Robert K Roach |
Plaintiff |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER ADOPTING 29 Findings and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. RECOMMENDATION: T herefore, I recommend that the District Court dismiss all of Plaintiffs claims against all the Defendants pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a cause of action cognizable by this Court. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 1/26/2010) (ttm) |
Filing 29 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS on case: Magistrate Judge Robert K Roach no longer assigned to case. Therefore, I recommend that the District Court dismiss all of Plaintiffs claims against all the Defendants pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a cause of action cognizable by this Court. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Robert K Roach on 11/5/09) (ttm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.