Lawson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
| Paul Eugene Lawson |
| Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID |
| 7:2019cv00016 |
| February 8, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Barbara MG Lynn |
| Hal R Ray |
| Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 29
JUDGMENT. It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED with prejudice. 2. The motion and amended motion in intervention (ECF Nos. 7, 12) and motion to join the real party in interest (ECF No. 19) are DENIED as moot. 3. The Clerk shall transmit a true copy of this Judgment and the Order Accepting the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge to the parties. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 4/8/2019) (trt)
|
|
Filing 28
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations and Denying Certificate of Appealability re: #24 Findings and Recommendations on Case. If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 4/8/2019) (trt)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:28, 29. Mon Apr 8 11:46:30 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 27 RESPONSE filed by Paul Eugene Lawson re: #24 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 26 MOTION to Issue and Serve Service of Process filed by Paul Eugene Lawson (trt) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER: A review of the Court's docket in this case shows that Petitioner has paid the $5.00 filing fee. Accordingly, Petitioner's Motions (ECF Nos. #8 , #11 ) are DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 3/15/2019) (skg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:25. Fri Mar 15 10:31:36 CDT 2019 (crt) |
|
Filing 24
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: After considering the petition and applicable law, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Chief United States District Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn DENY Lawson's petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. #1 ). For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED. In light of this recommendation, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Lawson's motion and amended motion in intervention (ECF Nos. #7 , #12 ), motion to join the real party in interest (ECF No. #19 ), and any similar motions filed after the entry of this recommendation be DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 3/14/2019) (skg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:24. Thu Mar 14 09:48:44 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 23 Affidavit in Support of Asservation and Declaration by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 22 Affidavit in Support re #19 Motion to Join the Real Party in Interest filed by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 21 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 20 Memorandum in Support re #19 Motion to Join the Real Party in Interest filed by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 19 Motion to Join the Real Party in Interest filed by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 18 Notice to Include and Augment Record filed by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 17 Notice of payment of filing fee (Receipt #WF002740) by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 16 Affidavit in Support of Power of Attorney by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 15 Affidavit in Support of Denial of Corporate Existence by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 14 Memorandum in Support of #13 Amended Complaint in Intervention filed by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 13 Amended Complaint in Intervention filed by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 12 Amended Motion to Intervene filed by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 11 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 10 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by Paul Eugene Lawson re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (skg) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Petitioner shall pay the required $5.00 filing fee to the Clerk of Court on or before March 7, 2019. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 2/14/2019) (skg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Thu Feb 14 11:10:26 CST 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Intervene filed by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 6 Affidavit in Support of Power of Attorney by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
| Filing 5 "Complaint in Intervention" filed by Paul Eugene Lawson. (skg) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: Paul Eugene Lawson must address the following deficiency: Upon review of the papers and pleadings, it appears that Petitioner has failed to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 3/11/2019. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 2/11/2019) (skg)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Mon Feb 11 10:48:45 CST 2019 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (skg) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Ray (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (skg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Paul Eugene Lawson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (skg) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Fri Feb 8 14:04:36 CST 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lawson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Paul Eugene Lawson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
