Flores v. SkyWest Airlines, Inc. et al
| Maria Lucia Flores |
| Republic Airways Holdings, Inc., SkyWest Airlines, Inc., Skywest, Inc. and Republic Airways, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00175 |
| September 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Rolando Olvera |
| Ignacio Torteya |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER. ETT: 3 days. Jury. Amended Pleadings due by 2/21/2020. Pltf Expert Witness List due by 5/29/2020. Pltf Expert Report due by 5/29/2020. Deft Expert Witness List due by 6/30/2020. Deft Expert Report due by 6/30/2020. Discovery due by 7/6/2020. Mediation due by 5/15/2020. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 7/10/2020. Joint Pretrial Order due by 10/16/2020.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(dbenavides, 1)
|
|
Filing 12
Order entered by the Court. The Court is in receipt of the jointly proposed scheduling order and Joint Motion to Appear Telephonically for Initial Conference filed by the parties. Dkt. Nos. 10 and 11. In light of the parties' agreement concerning case deadlines, the initial pretrial conference set for October 21, 2019, is CANCELED. The parties' Joint Motion (Dkt. No. 10) is DENIED as moot. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(dbenavides, 1)
|
| Filing 11 Agreed PROPOSED ORDER SCHEDULING ORDER, filed.(Salazar, Miguel) |
| Filing 10 Joint Motion to Appear Telephonically for Initial Conference by Maria Lucia Flores, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Salazar, Miguel) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER SCHEDULING ORDER, filed.(Salazar, Miguel) |
| Filing 8 Agreed JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Maria Lucia Flores, filed.(Salazar, Miguel) |
| Filing 7 First CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by SkyWest Airlines, Inc., filed.(Rigby, Alton) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Maria Lucia Flores, filed.(Salazar, Miguel) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Actions as to Defendant Republic Airways, Inc. by Republic Airways, Inc., filed.(Hicks, Pamela) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Republic Airways Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED that the deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is October 7, 2019.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(EdnitaPonce, 1)
|
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time To Answer or Otheriwse Respond to Plaintiff's ComplaintMotions referred to Ignacio Torteya, III. by Republic Airways, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 10/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Paula Wegman in Support of Motion to Extend Time, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Answer)(Hicks, Pamela) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/21/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1 before Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya III(Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(EdnitaPonce, 1)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 357th District Court, case number 2019-DCL-04476 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23140803) filed by SkyWest Airlines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(Lawrence, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
