Lopez v. Dillard Texas South
Silvia Lopez |
Dillard Texas South and Dillard Texas South, LLC doing business as Dillard's Department Store |
1:2021cv00030 |
March 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Rolando Olvera |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RECEIPT of Transmittal Letter from Cameron County District Clerk filed under case 2020-DCL-05687 received on 4/22/21, filed.(jtabares, 1) |
Filing 5 Letter to Laura Perez-Reyes, Cameron County District Clerk re: Remand, filed. (dnoriega, 1) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion to Remand.(Signed by Judge Rolando Olvera) Parties notified.(dnoriega, 1) |
Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION to Remand by Silvia Lopez, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gomez, Jorge) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/13/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4 before Judge Rolando Olvera(Signed by Judge Rolando Olvera) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Silvia Lopez (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26069910) filed by Dillard Texas South. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Valadez, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.