De Los Santos et al v. Autotransportes Libre Comercio S.A. de C.V. et al
| Ubaldo De Los Santos and Rosa Mayorga |
| Autotransportes Libre Comercio S.A. de C.V., ALC Express LLC and Luis Avila |
| 1:2022cv00167 |
| December 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Rolando Olvera |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 First CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Ubaldo De Los Santos, filed.(Wike, Angelina) |
| Filing 4 First CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Autotransportes Libre Comercio S.A. de C.V., Luis Avila, filed.(Hunter, James) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Autotransportes Libre Comercio S.A. de C.V., Luis Avila, filed.(Hunter, James) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/14/2023 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4 before Judge Rolando Olvera(Signed by Judge Rolando Olvera) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from At Law No. 1, case number 2022-CCL-00452 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29157427) filed by Autotransportes Libre Comercio S.A. de C.V., Luis Avila. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Hunter, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
