Keys v. Torres et al
| Robert Daniel Keys |
| Candace Torres, Kiesha Collins, John & Jane Does of the M.S.C.P. Panel, John & Jane Does of the D.R.C. Committee and TDCJ-ID |
| 2:2012cv00350 |
| November 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Corpus Christi Office |
| Bee |
| B. Janice Ellington |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
177
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 176 MOTION TO TRANSFER RECORD AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPT.(Signed by Magistrate Judge B Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(sscotch, 2)
|
|
Filing
168
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS GRANTING 140 MOTION for Summary Judgment . CASE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(amartinez, 2)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: [granting 140] MOTION for Summary Judgment , 156 Memorandum and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
|
|
Filing
155
OPINION AND ORDER denying 154 Motion to Take Judicial Notice of Retaliation.(Signed by Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 131 Memorandum and Recommendations, denying 118 AMENDED 109 MOTION MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
|
|
Filing
114
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL denying 113 Motion to Appoint.(Signed by Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION re: 101 MOTION to Dismiss All Causes of Action Asserted Against All "Doe" Defendants in the Amended Complaint, 105 Memorandum and Recommendations, 100 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION DENYING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re: 32 Memorandum and Recommendations, 25 MOTION for Order to Show Cause as to for a Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
|
|
Filing
51
OPINION AND ORDER ON FIRST AND SECOND MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT, ORDER SUSPENDING DEADLINES, AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; granting in part and denying in part 50 MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, denying as moot 46 MOTION for Extension of Time TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION, granting 41 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Signed by Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
|
|
Filing
27
OPINION AND ORDER denying 24 Motion to Appoint Counsel.(Signed by Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 11 Memorandum and Recommendations. Pltff's First Amendment claim is RETAINED. Plaintiff's other claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lcayce, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
