Vera v. Thaler

Petitioner: Antonio Flores Vera
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Case Number: 2:2013cv00071
Filed: March 13, 2013
Court: Texas Southern District Court
Office: Corpus Christi Office
County: Galveston
Referring Judge: Brian L Owsley
Presiding Judge: Nelva Gonzales Ramos
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 22, 2013 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO SUMMARILY DISMISS HABEAS PETITION re: 6 Memorandum and Recommendation. In the event that the Petitioner seeks a Certificate of Appealability, the request is DENIED.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vera v. Thaler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Antonio Flores Vera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.