Bartolomei v. Stephens
Petitioner: Jorge B Bartolomei
Respondent: William Stephens
Case Number: 2:2016cv00042
Filed: February 8, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Corpus Christi Office
County: Bee
Presiding Judge: B. Janice Ellington
Presiding Judge: Hilda G Tagle
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: granting 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Brief in Support, 9 Memorandum and Recommendations. Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bartolomei v. Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jorge B Bartolomei
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Stephens
Represented By: Edward Larry Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?