Sena v. O'Malley
Joe F. Sena |
Martin J. O'Malley |
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel |
2:2024cv00227 |
October 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Julie K Hampton |
Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER & Briefing Schedule(Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified. (jrm2) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Martin J. O'Malley, filed. (Attachments: #1 Certified Administrative Record) (Bowie, Roberta) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Roberta Bowie on behalf of Martin J. O'Malley, filed. (Bowie, Roberta) |
Filing 4 STATEMENT Non-Consent to the Magistrate Judge re: #3 Clerks Notice re Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Joe F. Sena, filed. (Chermol, David) |
Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent / Declination to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge in a Social Security case. Parties notified, filed. (lg2) |
Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (lg2) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin J. O'Malley (Commissioner of SSA and U.S. Attorney served by NEF at the designated email addresses.) filed by Joe F. Sena. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lg2) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/9/2024) IFP granted by Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock on 10/8/24. (lg2). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.