Garza v. O'Malley
Norma Alicia Garza |
Martin J. O'Malley |
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel |
2:2024cv00229 |
October 15, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Mitchel Neurock |
Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Katauna J. King on behalf of Martin J. O'Malley, filed. (King, Katauna) |
Filing 5 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Norma Alicia Garza, filed. (Sbrolla, Lindsey) |
Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (var2) |
Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent / Declination to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge in a Social Security case. Parties notified, filed. (var2) |
Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock randomly selected to receive referrals. This case will be automatically referred to the randomly selected magistrate judge under the governing Special Order or divisional procedures. (var2) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Norma Alicia Garza, filed. (Sbrolla, Lindsey) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin J. O'Malley (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-32333572) (Commissioner of SSA and U.S. Attorney served by NEF at the designated email addresses.) filed by Norma Alicia Garza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Sbrolla, Lindsey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.