Longoria v. Nueces County, Texas
| Sara J. Longoria |
| Nueces County, Texas |
| 2:2025cv00012 |
| January 17, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David S Morales |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Nueces County, Texas, filed. (Reustle, Nicole) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Sara J. Longoria, filed. (Brooks, Jon) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #3 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. by Nueces County, Texas, filed. (Reustle, Nicole) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time Defendant must file any responsive pleading to Plaintiff's first amended complaint by 3/5/2025.(Signed by Judge David S Morales) Parties notified. (jrm2)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time File a Responsive Pleading by Nueces County, Texas, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/11/2025. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Reustle, Nicole) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole Reustle on behalf of Nueces County, Texas, filed. (Reustle, Nicole) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/10/2025 at 09:30 AM before Judge David S Morales. (Signed by Judge David S Morales) Parties notified. (var2)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Nueces County, Texas. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (var2) |
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (var2) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (var2) |
| Filing 3 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Nueces County, Texas filed by Sara J. Longoria. (Brooks, Jon) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Nueces County, Texas, filed. (Brooks, Jon) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nueces County, Texas (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-32782657) filed by Sara J. Longoria. (Brooks, Jon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Longoria v. Nueces County, Texas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sara J. Longoria | |
| Represented By: | Jon D Brooks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nueces County, Texas | |
| Represented By: | Nicole Michelle Reustle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
