Rodgers et al v. Spar Business Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Maceo Rodgers and Lee McClung
Defendant: Spar Business Services, Inc., Robert G Brown and William H Bartels
Case Number: 3:2014cv00055
Filed: February 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Galveston Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Gregg Costa
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1938
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 83 OPINION AND ORDER denying 72 Plaintiffs Renewed Motion for Nationwide Conditional Collective Action Certification and Court-Authorized Notice Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(h).(Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, 3)
December 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part 25 Motion to Conditionally Certify Class. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the conditional certification is LIMITED to merchandisers utilized by SPAR in the greater Houston and Galveston areas from July 15, 2012, t o the present. It is further ORDERED that SPARs request that a third-party administrator be retained by Plaintiff to receive SPARs disclosures and to conduct the notification procedures is DENIED. ORDERED that the statute of limitations WILL BE TOL LED as of the date the Notice is mailed, but without prejudice to reconsideration after appropriate discovery has been completed. The Parties are ORDERED to promptly confer with regard to the timing of SPARs disclosures and the appropriate form of th e Notice to be sent. If these matters have not been resolved by December 11, 2015, the Parties SHALL so notify the Court and a prompt Hearing will be set to resolve any remaining disputes..(Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, 3)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodgers et al v. Spar Business Services, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maceo Rodgers
Represented By: John F Melton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lee McClung
Represented By: John F Melton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spar Business Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert G Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William H Bartels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?