Vaughn v. Massie, Asst. Regional Director et al
William Kelly Vaughn |
Steve Massie, Asst. Regional Director, J. Jones, Asst. Warden, Sgt. Augustine Osadolor and Daundrea Starling, Food Service Manager III |
3:2016cv00021 |
January 25, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Galveston Office |
Brazoria |
George C. Hanks |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 64 MOTION for Relief from Judgment (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(agould, 3) |
Filing 59 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Dkt. 47 MOTION Not to Accept Defendant D'Aundrea Starling's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, Dkt. 45 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Dkt. 53 MOTION to Seal Defendant Starling's Amended Brief in Support of Defendant Starling's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. All other pending motions are DENIED as MOOT.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ltrevino, 3) |
Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 25 and 26 Motions for Summary Judgment; DENYING 7 Motion to Compel; DENYING 11 , 20 , 23 , 27 and 28 Motions for Default Judgment; GRANTING 18 Motion to Deny Default Judgment; and DENYING 21 Motion Requesting Court to Serve Defendants Copies of Filings.J. Jones, Asst. Warden and Sgt. Augustine Osadolor terminated(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(dwilkerson, 3) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.