Biotics Research v. Standard Process Inc
| Biotics Research Corp |
| Standard Process Inc |
| 4:2003cv00733 |
| February 27, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Vanessa D Gilmore |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2003. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting [9-1] stipulation of dismissal , entered; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore ) (ljackson)
|
| Case closed (ljackson) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION of dismissal with prejudice, by Biotics Research , filed (kprice) |
| Per phone call on 6/6/03, all parties were notified that the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is reset to 6/13/03 at 1:30 pm (kprice) |
| Deadline updated; Reset Rule 16 scheduling conference for 1:30 6/13/03 before Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore (kprice) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER ; granting [7-1] joint motion for extension of time for joint discovery case management plan, initial disclosures and scheduling conference ; Set parties shall file their joint discovery/case management plan by 7/10/03 , Set scheduling conference for 1:30 7/18/03 before Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore , entered; Parties exchange Initial Disclosures by 7/13/03 ; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore ) (kprice)
|
| Filing 7 JOINT MOTION for extension of time for joint discovery case management plan, initial disclosures and scheduling conference , by Biotics Research, Standard Process Inc , filed (psmith) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Standard Process Inc , filed. (kprice) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS by Biotics Research , filed. (kprice) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons & Complaint executed as to Deft Standard Process Inc 3/5/03 filed. Answer due on 3/25/03 (fmremp) |
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Regarding Discovery Motions, Regarding Discovery Motions, Motions for Summary Judgment and Analogous Motions to Dismiss , entered. Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore ) (kprice)
|
|
Filing 2
Order setting Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference on 1:30 6/20/03 before Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore and Order to Disclose Interested Persons, filed. ( Signed by Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore ) Parties notified. (bchurchill)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT by Biotics Research filed; FILING FEE $ 150.00 RECEIPT # 529314 (bchurchill) |
| Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks, AO-120, ntfd (bchurchill) |
| 1 SUMMONS issued for Standard Process Inc (bchurchill) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Biotics Research v. Standard Process Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Biotics Research Corp | |
| Represented By: | Paul S Francis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Standard Process Inc | |
| Represented By: | Craig P Romero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
