Alfaro et al V City of Houston et al
||Edith Alfaro, Jane Doe One, Jane Doe Two and Jane Doe Three
||City of Houston and Abraham Joseph
||April 21, 2011
||US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
||Lee H Rosenthal
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 9, 2013
FINAL JUDGMENT entered. Case terminated on 7/9/13.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|March 12, 2012
ORDER entered DENYING as MOOT 4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Petition (DE 1-12).(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
|September 19, 2011
ORDER entered: The parties have filed an agreed motion for a protective order. (Docket Entry No. 21). Paragraph 9 on page 3 of the proposed order must be revised to reflect that under the case law, a higher good-cause showing is required to file do cuments under seal with the court than to designate them as confidential when they are exchanged in discovery. The paragraph must be revised to state that when documents designated as confidential are filed with the court, they may initially be file d under seal but will not be maintained under seal unless the party designating them as confidential files a motion to do so. Such a motion must be filed 7 days after the filing, must show good cause for sealing the documents, and must state whether the opposing party contests filing the documents under seal. The parties may file a revised agreed protective order no later than September 30, 2011.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?