SuperSpeed Software, Inc. v. Google Corporation of Mountain View, California Featured Case

Plaintiff: SuperSpeed Software, Inc.
Defendant: Google Corporation of Mountain View, California
Case Number: 4:2012cv01688
Filed: June 5, 2012
Court: Texas Southern District Court
Office: Houston Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Sim Lake
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

We have record of the following docket entries for this case:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 5, 2012 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0541-9838642) filed by SuperSpeed Software, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A)(Manne, Neal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SuperSpeed Software, Inc. v. Google Corporation of Mountain View, California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SuperSpeed Software, Inc.
Represented By: Max Lalon Tribble, Jr
Represented By: Neal S Manne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Google Corporation of Mountain View, California
Represented By: David J Beck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?