Baker v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
| Steve Baker |
| Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston, Frank Szymczak, Elton S Sims, Steven Martinez, David Kramer and Daniel Melchor |
| 4:2012cv02241 |
| July 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Anderson |
| Sim Lake |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER Adopting 66 Memorandum and Recommendations with the exception of Defendants' objections with regard to the due process claim, which is sustained; summary judgment is granted on that claim. 59 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment is denied. 52 MOTION to Dismiss 50 Return of Service Executed is denied. 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment is denied. 46 Motion for Spoiliation Sanction is denied with leave to reassert it at time of trial. (Discovery due by 3/10/2014. No fur ther Dispositive Motions will be filed. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 3/20/2014. Joint Pretrial Order due by 4/4/2014. Docket Call set for 4/11/2014 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake.) (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 42 Memorandum and Recommendations, denying 22 MOTION for Judgment. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
