Nall et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
| Michael Nall and Flora Nall |
| BNSF Railway Company, National Carriers' Conference Committee, United Transportation Union and United Transportation Union Health and Welfare Committee |
| 4:2014cv02819 |
| October 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Houston Office |
| Harris |
| Melinda Harmon |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER granting 84 motion for leave to file; denying 85 motion for judgment on the pleadings. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(rhawkins)
|
|
Filing
65
OPINION AND ORDER denying in part; granting in part 62 Plaintiffs' Objections to 60 BNSF Railway Company's Bill of Costs. It is hereby Ordered that Plaintiffs's Objections, is DENIED IN PART. Accordingly, BNSF's Bill of Costs is GRANTED with the exception of $148.00 in shipping and delivery fees. Accordingly, BNSF is entitled to recover 7,152.63 from Plaintiffs. (Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(rhawkins)
|
|
Filing
57
OPINION AND ORDER. Nall's Motion to Strike 40 is DENIED. Nall's Motion for Summary Judgment 38 is DENIED. BNSF's Motion for Summary Judgment 39 is GRANTED.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(rhawkins)
|
|
Filing
36
OPINION AND ORDER granting 18 Motion to Dismiss.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(rhawkins)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
