Englobal U.S. Inc. v. Native American Services Corporation
Plaintiff: Englobal U.S. Inc.
Defendant: Native American Services Corporation
Counter_claimant: Native American Services Corporation
Counter_defendant: Englobal U.S. Inc.
Case Number: 4:2016cv02746
Filed: September 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
County: Harris
Presiding Judge: Lee H Rosenthal
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 75 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered; ENGlobal's second motion for summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 56), ENGlobal's motion to exclude Native Americans expert testimony, (Docket Entry No. 58), ENGlobal's motion to designate a responsible th ird party, (Docket Entry No. 60), Native American's motions to exclude the testimony of ENGlobal's damages and technical experts, (Docket Entries No. 62, 65), and Native American's motion for partial summary judgment, (Docket Entry No. 64), are denied. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
October 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION entered GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 28 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment , DENYING 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment . (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
September 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER entered: The motion to amend the complaint, (Docket Entry No. 31), is denied. The motion to strike the amended complaint, (Docket Entry No. 35), is denied as moot. The motion for leave to file a surreply, (Docket Entry No. 37), is granted. The court will rule on the motion for summary judgment and the motion for partial summary judgment, (Docket Entry Nos. 2728), after Native American Services Corporation files its surreply. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Englobal U.S. Inc. v. Native American Services Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Englobal U.S. Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey Lawrence Diamond
Represented By: Malinda Edwards de Mata
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Native American Services Corporation
Represented By: Steven B Harris
Represented By: Amanda Dodds Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Native American Services Corporation
Represented By: Amanda Dodds Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Englobal U.S. Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey Lawrence Diamond
Represented By: Malinda Edwards de Mata
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?