Riggs et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Joyce Riggs and Douglas Riggs |
National Railroad Passenger Corporation |
4:2018cv02402 |
July 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Houston Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Lee H Rosenthal |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION for Jason J. Markey to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Douglas Riggs, Joyce Riggs, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/2/2018. (ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leo J. Palazzo to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Douglas Riggs, Joyce Riggs, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/2/2018. (ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Mario A. Arteaga, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Douglas Riggs, Joyce Riggs, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/2/2018. (ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
Filing 2 ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 10/26/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(ShoshanaArnowadi, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Railroad Passenger Corporation filed by Joyce Riggs, Douglas Riggs.(ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
Filing fee: $400 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number HOU081633, filed. (ckrus, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.