Gardiner v. Davis et al
| Leroy Wayne Gardiner |
| LVN T Bowen, Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis, PA Laschberger and Lorie Davis |
| 4:2018cv02921 |
| August 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 LETTER TO THE COURT from Leroy Wayne Gardiner re: Do Not Consent to a Magistrate Judge to preside over subject matter, filed. (nortiz, 5) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (dperez, 3) |
| Filing 4 **IMAGE NOT ATTACHED. PLEASE DISREGARD**NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (dperez, 3) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Leroy Wayne Gardiner, filed. (dperez, 3) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Leroy Wayne Gardiner, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/13/2018. (dperez, 3) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against T Bowen, Lorie Davis, Laschberger (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Leroy Wayne Gardiner. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(dperez, 3) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
