Garcia v. International Construction Equipment Inc.
Ricardo G. Garcia |
International Construction Equipment Inc. |
4:2018cv03575 |
October 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lynn N Hughes |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Electronic Access to Record on Appeal Provided re: #5 Notice of Appeal to Randall Poerschke. Attorneys of record at the Circuit may #download the record from the Court of Appeals. (USCA No. 18-20710), filed.(dbenavides, 1) |
Electronic record on appeal certified to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals re: #5 Notice of Appeal USCA No. 18-20710, filed.(dbenavides, 1) |
Notice of Assignment of USCA No. 18-20710 re: #5 Notice of Appeal, filed.(dbenavides, 1) |
Appeal Review Notes re: #5 Notice of Appeal. Fee status: Paid. The appeal filing fee has been paid. No hearings were held in the case - no transcripts. Number of DKT-13 Forms expected: 1, filed.(scastillo, 1) |
Filing 7 Clerks Notice of Filing of an Appeal. The following Notice of Appeal and related motions are pending in the District Court: #5 Notice of Appeal. Fee status: Paid, filed. (scastillo, 1) |
Filing 6 DKT13 TRANSCRIPT ORDER REQUEST by Scott Poerschke. No hearings This order form relates to the following: #5 Notice of Appeal, filed.(Poerschke, Randall) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL to US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit re: #4 Order of Dismissal, by Ricardo G. Garcia (Filing fee $ 505, receipt number 0541-21106937), filed.(Poerschke, Randall) |
Filing 4 Final DISMISSAL. Having been advised that Garcia no longer wishes to pursue his claims against International Construction, this case is dismissed without prejudice #3 . If refiled in or removed to this district, the case will be assigned to Judge Lynn N. Hughes. Case terminated on 10/5/2018. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Dismissal as to Ricardo G. Garcia, International Construction Equipment Inc. by Ricardo G. Garcia, filed. (Poerschke, Randall) |
Filing 2 ORDER FOR CONFERENCE. Initial Conference set for 1/7/2019 at 03:00 PM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N Hughes (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified.(hcarradi, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against International Construction Equipment Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-21012278) filed by Ricardo G. Garcia.(Poerschke, Randall) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Garcia v. International Construction Equipment Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: International Construction Equipment Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ricardo G. Garcia | |
Represented By: | Randall Scott Poerschke, Jr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.