Brown v. City Of Houston et al
| Casey Brown |
| Charles A McClelland, Jr., Jason Loosmore and City Of Houston |
| 4:2018cv04409 |
| November 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Nancy K Johnson |
| Sim Lake |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Substitute.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy K Johnson) Parties notified.(sjones, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Nancy K Johnson (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
|
|
Filing 2
Unopposed MOTION to Substitute Service on Defendant Jason Loosmore by Casey Brown, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Farah, George)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 151st Harris County District Court, case number 2018-73987 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-21314002) filed by Charles A McClelland, Jr., City Of Houston. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Original Petition, #3 Exhibit B - CMRRR, #4 Exhibit C - Domestic Return Receipt, #5 Exhibit D - COH Defs Answer, #6 Exhibit E - State Court Docket Sheet, #7 Exhibit F - Index of Documents, #8 Exhibit G - List of Counsel)(Cohen, Marjorie)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
