Khalil et al v. Mayflower Transit, LLC et al
|Plaintiff:||Mohamed Khalil and Elaine Khalil|
|Defendant:||Suddath Relocation Systems of Houston, Inc. and Mayflower Transit, LLC|
|Filed:||April 15, 2019|
|Court:||US District Court for the Southern District of Texas|
|Nature of Suit:||Commerce ICC Rates, Etc.|
|Cause of Action:||49 U.S.C. § 81|
|Jury Demanded By:||None|
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
|Date Filed||Document Text|
|April 15, 2019||Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Suddath Relocation Systems of Houston, Inc., filed.(Henry, Vic)|
|April 15, 2019||Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Mayflower Transit, LLC, Suddath Relocation Systems of Houston, Inc., filed.(Henry, Vic)|
|April 15, 2019||Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 269th Judicial District Court, Harris County, case number 2019-13259 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22242167) filed by Suddath Relocation Systems of Houston, Inc., Mayflower Transit, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit B - Index for Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit B-1 - Plaintiffs' Original Petition, #4 Exhibit B-2 - CItations Issued and Affidavits of Service, #5 Exhibit B-3 - Mayflower Original Answer, #6 Exhibit B-4 - Suddath's Original Answer, #7 Exhibit B-5 - Mayflower Counterclaim, #8 Exhibit B-6 - Suddath Counterclaim, #9 Exhibit C - List of Counsel of Record, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(Henry, Vic)|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.