Facundo v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
| FACUNDO ADRIEL and Adriel Facundo |
| Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC d/b/a Firestone Complete Auto Care |
| 4:2019cv01876 |
| May 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC d/b/a Firestone Complete Auto Care, filed.(Haas, Leslee) |
| Filing 4 DESIGNATION of T. Christopher Trent as attorney in charge of Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC d/b/a Firestone Complete Auto Care, filed.(Trent, Thomas) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/9/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 704 before Magistrate Judge Frances H Stacy. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(hcarradi, 4)
|
| Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, by Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC d/b/a Firestone Complete Auto Care, filed.(Haas, Leslee) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 269TH DISTRICT COURT, case number 2019-28792 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22493476) filed by Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC d/b/a Firestone Complete Auto Care. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(Haas, Leslee) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
