Logan v. Davis
| Carl Logan |
| Joni White and Lorie Davis |
| 4:2019cv02678 |
| July 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Carl Logan, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/12/2019. (agarcia, 7) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph P. Corcoran on behalf of Lorie Davis, filed. (Corcoran, Joseph) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FOR SERVICE ON TX ATTORNEY GENERAL. Answer due for Lorie Davis 9/23/2019; denying #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Copy of order and petition electronically sent to the Attorney General of Texas, and the Attorney General's Docketing Clerk; and by mail to Lorie Davis.(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) (Attachments: #1 Petition) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (bmendoza, 5) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Carl Logan, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/7/2019. (bmendoza, 5) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State Custody (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Carl Logan.(bmendoza, 5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
