Gonzales v. District Court of Brazoria County et al
| Alejandro Gonzales |
| District Court of Brazoria County and The Court of Appeals for the State of Texas |
| 4:2019cv03111 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT as to Alejandro Gonzales. More Definite Statement due by 11/15/2019 (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
|
| Filing 6 Proposed CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Alejandro Gonzales, filed.(sanderson, 4) |
| Partial PLRA Filing fee: $50.00 re: #5 Order, receipt number HOU090939, filed. (GloriaVasquez, 4) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (SarahShelby, 4) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Alejandro Gonzales, filed. (SarahShelby, 4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Alejandro Gonzales, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/9/2019. (SarahShelby, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against District Court of Brazoria County, The Court of Appeals for the State of Texas (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Alejandro Gonzales.(SarahShelby, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
