Montenegro v. Quaterman et al
| Jorge Montenegro |
| Nathaniel Quaterman, Rick Thaler and Lorie Davis |
| 4:2019cv03132 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Nancy F Atlas |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER denying Montenegros motion for relief from thedismissal order under Rule 59(e) #7 (Signed by Judge Nancy F Atlas) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4)
|
| Filing 7 Opposition Memorandum of Law by Jorge Montenegro, filed.(sguevara, 4) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL denying #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice as barred by 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Case terminated on 8/29/19. Copy mailed to TDCJ-Office of the General Counsel. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Nancy F Atlas) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (mxperez, 5) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Nathaniel Quaterman, filed. (mxperez, 5) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jorge Montenegro, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/9/2019. (mxperez, 5) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Lorie Davis, Nathaniel Quaterman, Rick Thaler (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Jorge Montenegro.(mxperez, 5) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
