Moghul et al v. United States of America et al
Moshtak Muhammad, Anam Mirza, Abdullah Mohammad, Maryam Mirza, Shazia Moghul and Zaineb Mirza |
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Wallace L. Carroll, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Kevin K. McAleenan and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli |
4:2019cv03168 |
August 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lynn N Hughes |
Other Statutory Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Having been advised that Shazia Moghul wants to dismiss this case, it is dismissed without prejudice. Case terminated on 10/15/2019. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified.(ghassan, 4) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Dismissal as to All Defendants by Zaineb Mirza, Abdullah Mohammad, Moshtak Muhammad, Anam Mirza, Shazia Moghul, Maryam Mirza, filed. (Quan, Gordon) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Shazia Moghul, filed.(Quan, Gordon) |
Summons Issued as to Wallace L. Carroll, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Kevin K. McAleenan, United States of America, U.S. Attorney. Issued summons returned to plaintiff in person, filed.(jdav, 4) |
Filing 1 PETITION/COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-23043805.) filed by Zaineb Mirza, Abdullah Mohammad, Moshtak Muhammad, Anam Mirza, Shazia Moghul, Maryam Mirza.(Quan, Gordon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.