Green v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
| Lowell Quincy Green |
| Lvn Persinger, Anitra Lindsley, Jeffrey C. Matter, M.D. UTMS Director for Clinical Virology Cirrhosis, Ken Paxton, Sergio Perez, Molley White, James E Bavis, Edward Larry Marshall, University of Texas Medical Branch, Jessican S. Khan and Brantley Starr |
| 4:2019cv04635 |
| November 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Letter from Lowell Quincy Green re: Consent To Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, filed. (ocasas, 7) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - Plaintiff does not demonstrate that he was inimminent danger of serious physical injury at the time he filed the instant lawsuit, and he may not proceed in forma pauper is. This lawsuit is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to section 191 S(g). Any and all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT....*** Case terminated on 12/2/19. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Lowell Quincy Green. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(ShoshanaArnow, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
