Poorboy v. Quanta Services, Inc.
| annette poorboy |
| Quanta Services, Inc. and Stronghold, Ltd. |
| 4:2020cv00989 |
| March 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Annette Poorboy, filed.(Craighead, Clayton) |
| Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Stronghold, Ltd. filed by Annette Poorboy.(Craighead, Clayton) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Quanta Services, Inc., filed.(Oathout, Monica) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Quanta Services, Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(ShadiaNash, 4) Modified on 4/9/2020 (ShadiaNash, 4). |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Quanta Services, Inc., filed.(Craighead, Clayton) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/26/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Quanta Services, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-24435236) filed by annette poorboy.(Craighead, Clayton) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
