Bondyopadhyay et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon
Probir K. Bondyopadhyay and Madhuri Bondyopadhyay |
The Bank of New York Mellon, As Trustee and The Bank of New York Mellon |
4:2020cv01340 |
April 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Summers, Monica) |
Filing 11 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Madhuri Bondyopadhyay, Probir K. Bondyopadhyay, filed.(sguevara, 4) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Affidavit of Beneficiary Owner by Madhuri Bondyopadhyay and Probir K. Bondyopadhyay, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/12/2020. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(JessieHutchinson, 2) |
Filing 9 BRIEF re: #1 Notice of Removal,,,, by Madhuri Bondyopadhyay, Probir K. Bondyopadhyay, filed.(sguevara, 4) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File Letter written by defendant's attorney Summers by Madhuri Bondyopadhyay, Probir K. Bondyopadhyay, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/5/2020. (rguerrero, 4) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 State Court Petition/Notice of Removal by Madhuri Bondyopadhyay, Probir K. Bondyopadhyay, filed.(sguevara, 4) |
Filing 6 ORDER - The Bank of New York Mellon has indicated that it would like to consolidate this case with a case currently before Judge Hughes, Bondyopadhyay, et al. v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, 4:20-cv-1359 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 16, 2020). Because of the apparent similarities between the two cases, the court finds that transfer and coordination is appropriate. The court will address whether consolidation is appropriate at a later time. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE IN A REMOVED ACTION by The Bank of New York Mellon, filed.(McInnis, Walter) |
Filing 4 ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 6/25/2020 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Supplement) Parties notified.(leddins, 4) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ClaudiaGutierrezadi, 4) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by The Bank of New York Mellon, As Trustee, filed.(Summers, Monica) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 61st District Court; Harris County, case number 2019-68895 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-24553049) filed by The Bank of New York Mellon, As Trustee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiffs' original petition, #3 Exhibit 2 - Plaintiffs' correspondence, #4 Exhibit 3 - Citations/returns, #5 Exhibit 4 - Plaintiffs' proposed order, #6 Exhibit 5 - Plaintiffs' additional defendant included in the case, #7 Exhibit 6 - Plaintiffs' motion for judicial determination of essential facts to resolve the case, #8 Exhibit 7 - Plaintiffs' motion for judicial determination of ownership of this fraudulent financial instrument defendants, #9 Exhibit 8 - Plaintiffs' motion for including of a new defendant, #10 Exhibit 9 - Notice of intent to dismiss, #11 Exhibit 10 - BoNYM's answer, #12 Exhibit 11 - State court docket sheet, #13 Exhibit 12 - Civil cover sheet, #14 Exhibit 13 - List of attorneys, #15 Exhibit 14 - Harris county appraisal district real property account information)(McInnis, Walter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.