Guzman v. Luitjen
Petitioner: Martin Edgar Guzman
Respondent: Judge Mark Luitjen
Case Number: 4:2020cv01779
Filed: May 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David Hittner
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2020 Filing 4 NONCONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Martin Edgar Guzman, filed.(gkelner, 4)
May 22, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ShadiaNash, 4)
May 21, 2020 Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Martin Edgar Guzman, filed. (JosephWells, 4)
May 21, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION/COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus and Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (fee $ 400) filed by Martin Edgar Guzman.(jdav, 4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guzman v. Luitjen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Judge Mark Luitjen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Martin Edgar Guzman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?