Dava Pte Ltd. v. M/V NODUS et al
Plaintiff: Dava Pte Ltd.
Defendant: M/V NODUS and Domes Shipholding Corp.
Case Number: 4:2020cv02649
Filed: July 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: George C Hanks
Nature of Suit: Contract: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2020 Filing 11 Writ of Attachment issue, filed. (wbostic, 4)
July 28, 2020 Filing 10 Vessel Arrest WARRANT issued (Signed by Judge Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison), filed. (wbostic, 4)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Writ of Attachment. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison) Parties notified. (wbostic, 4)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Issuance of Warrant. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison) Parties notified. (wbostic, 4)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/12/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 600 in Houston before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison( Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(BrendaLacy, 4)
July 28, 2020 Filing 6 Process Receipt and Return by Dava Pte Ltd., filed.(Walker, David)
July 28, 2020 Filing 5 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Domes Shipholding Corp., M/V NODUS, filed. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted attachment)(Walker, David)
July 28, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Writ of Attachment by Dava Pte Ltd., filed. Motion Docket Date 8/18/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Writ of Attachment, #2 Unredacted attachment Writ of Attachment)(Walker, David)
July 28, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Issuance of Warrant by Dava Pte Ltd., filed. Motion Docket Date 8/18/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Motion for Issuance of, #2 Unredacted attachment Warrant of Arrest)(Walker, David)
July 28, 2020 Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of David R. Walker re: #1 Complaint,, filed.(Walker, David)
July 28, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Domes Shipholding Corp., M/V NODUS (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-24985090) filed by Dava Pte Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Exhibit B to Complaint, #3 Exhibit C to Complaint, #4 Exhibit D to Complaint, #5 Exhibit E to Complaint, #6 Exhibit F to Complaint, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Walker, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dava Pte Ltd. v. M/V NODUS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M/V NODUS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Domes Shipholding Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dava Pte Ltd.
Represented By: David R Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?